Re: [PATCH] Implement INSERT SET syntax

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [PATCH] Implement INSERT SET syntax
Дата
Msg-id 2720923.1648049571@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [PATCH] Implement INSERT SET syntax  (Gareth Palmer <gareth@internetnz.net.nz>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Implement INSERT SET syntax  (Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> writes:
> You have to either include the pre-requisite patches as 0001, and your patch as
> 0002 (as I'm doing now), or name your patch something other than *.diff or
> *.patch, so cfbot doesn't think it's a new version of the patch to be tested.

This patch has been basically ignored for a full two years now.
(Remarkably, it's still passing in the cfbot.)

I have to think that that means there's just not enough interest
to justify committing it.  Should we mark it rejected and move on?
If not, what needs to happen to get it unstuck?

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New Object Access Type hooks
Следующее
От: Dilip Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints