On 2014-05-24 14:21:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On 2014-05-24 12:35:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> If it's not getting through configure, the only plausible explanation
> >> seems to be that something in autoconf 2.69 broke it.
>
> > It could also be the linking changes made while trying to make missing
> > PGDLLIMPORTs more visible.
>
> None of those changes touched the configure script, though.
> Right.
> Regina, can you post config.log from 9.3 and 9.4?
> There's a couple of bugreports referencing _set_invalid_parameter_handle
> and mingw. With confusingly different explanations...
> Greetings,
> Andres Freund
Okay will do in a bit after I rebuild both.
FWIW: I'm not convinced its autoconf 2.69 at fault. I'm running autoconf
2.69
And as an experiment
In the 9.3.4 configure.in source code -- I changed the autoconf requirement
in configure.in to 2.69 and rebuilt the configure script (making sure I
deleted the old one before trying to rebuild)
It still configures fine with 9.3.4 (just tested with mingw32 gcc 4.9.0 and
same issue with that)
rebuilding the configure script for 9.4.0 still fails.
Sorry if this doesn't follow the thread -- for some reason I didn't get any
of these emails you sent.
Thanks again for the help,
Regina