Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1?
Дата
Msg-id 27402.1289241634@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1?  (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>)
Ответы Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1?  (Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>)
Список pgsql-performance
Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com> writes:
> No matter how you slice it, the default on Linux is implicitly changing and the choice is to either:
>  * Return the default to fdatasync
>  * Let it implicitly change to O_DSYNC

> The latter choice is the one that requires testing to prove that it is the proper and preferred default from the
performanceand data reliability POV. 

And, in fact, the game plan is to do that testing and see which default
we want.  I think it's premature to argue further about this until we
have some test results.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Scott Carey
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Defaulting wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux for 9.1?
Следующее
От: "Pierre C"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Select * is very slow