----- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart Bishop" <stuart@stuartbishop.net>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: "Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>, "SUNDAY A. OLUTAYO" <olutayo@sadeeb.com>, "Gavin Flower"
<GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz>,"Chris Ernst" <cernst@zvelo.com>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 1:00:56 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Linux Distribution Preferences?
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 08:46:58PM -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> The reasons to NOT use ubuntu under PostgreSQL are primarily that 1:
>> they often choose a pretty meh grade kernel with performance
>> regressions for their initial LTS release. I.e. they'll choose a
>> 3.4.0 kernel over a very stable 3.2.latest kernel, and then patch away
>> til the LTS becomes stable. This is especially problematic the first
>> 6 to 12 months after an LTS release.
I wouldn't call it a reason not to use Ubuntu, but a reason why you
might want to use the previous LTS release. The kernel chosen needs to
be supported for 5 years, yet remain stable enough for the supported
application releases to be supported for 5 years.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> This really sums it up for me. Do you need the most recent kernel with
> all the performance enhancements and new hardware support, and if so,
> are you willing to accept frequent updates and breakage as the bugs are
> fixed?
I hear lots of people like to wait for the .1 release of the LTS for
this sort of reason. It seems a common policy for applications too,
steering clear of .0 releases in favor of waiting for the initial
patch release.
--
Stuart Bishop <stuart@stuartbishop.net>
http://www.stuartbishop.net/
I always wait for one year to lapse before upgrading to the latest LTS
Thanks,
Sunday Olutayo