Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 00:43, Tom Lane wrote:
>> He's not. There were two other recent security reports, which core kept
>> to ourselves until the release could be made.
> Ah, ok -- fair enough. Are those additional security fixes mentioned in
> the release notes?
Yes, or at least the one that affected PG proper (pg_ctl as root).
The other was a bug in the RPM init script.
I just realized that Devrim wasn't in the loop on that, so he'll
probably have to rebuild the PGDG RPMs :-(
regards, tom lane