Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file
Дата
Msg-id 29796.1243904443@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> If so, it might be deleted after triggering the warm-standby. But, we cannot
> remove it because the latest xlog file which is required for normal recovery
> might exist in it. This is another undesirable scenario. Is this problem?

What recovery?  In the problem case you're positing, the slave server
has executed a checkpoint and come up live.  It's never going to be
interested in the old xlog again.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch: AdjustIntervalForTypmod shouldn't discard high-order data
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: dblink patches for comment