On 6/15/23 2:47 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
> Robert - can you please comment on what you are willing to commit in
> order to close out your open item here. My take is that the design for
> this, the tabular form a couple of emails ago (copied here), is
> ready-to-commit, just needing the actual (trivial) code changes to be
> made to accomplish it.
>
> Tabular form
>
> rolname | memberof | options |
> grantor
> ------------------+------------------+---------------------+------------------ postgres |
| | regress_du_admin | regress_du_role0+| admin, inherit, set+| postgres +
|regress_du_role1+| admin, inherit, set+| postgres + | regress_du_role2 | admin, inherit, set |
postgres regress_du_role0| | | regress_du_role1 | regress_du_role0+| admin,
inherit,set+| regress_du_admin+ | regress_du_role0+| inherit +|
regress_du_role1+ | regress_du_role0 | set | regress_du_role2 regress_du_role2 |
regress_du_role0+|admin +| regress_du_admin+ | regress_du_role0+| inherit, set +|
regress_du_role1+ | regress_du_role0+| empty +| regress_du_role2+ |
regress_du_role1| admin, set | regress_du_admin(5 rows)
>
[RMT hat]
Can we resolve this before Beta 2?[1] The RMT originally advised to try
to resolve before Beta 1[2], and this seems to be lingering.
Thanks,
Jonathan
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/460ae02a-3123-16a3-f2d7-ccd79778819b%40postgresql.org
[2]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d61db38b-29d9-81cc-55b3-8a5c704bb969%40postgresql.org