Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Don Baccus
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Дата
Msg-id 3.0.1.32.19990603151516.00dcee4c@mail.pacifier.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
At 05:39 PM 6/3/99 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

>But, but ... if we fixed the tuple-size problem then people could stop
>using large objects at all, and instead just put their data into tuples.
>I hate to see work going into improving LO support when we really ought
>to be phasing out the whole feature --- it's got *so* many conceptual
>and practical problems ...

Making them go away would be a real blessing.  Oracle folk
bitch about CLOBS and BLOBS and the like, too.  They're a 
pain.



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Vacuum ignores large objects
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items