At 02:13 PM 11/16/00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I think the default should probably be no delay, and the documentation
>> on enabling this needs to be clear and obvious (i.e. hard to miss).
>
>I just talked to Tom Lane about this. I think a sleep(0) just before
>the flush would be the best. It would reliquish the cpu slice if
>another process is ready to run. If no other backend is running, it
>probably just returns. If there is another one, it gives it a chance to
>complete. On return from sleep(0), it can check if it still needs to
>flush. This would tend to bunch up flushers so they flush only once,
>while not delaying cases where only one backend is running.
This sounds like an interesting approach, yes.
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.