At 10:02 8/12/01 +1100, Philip Warner wrote:
>At 15:16 7/12/01 +0100, Christof Petig wrote:
>>>
>>> Not really very generalizable when you consider user defined types,
>>> triggers etc.
>>
>>Hmmm. But if we have a primary key on columns (A,B,C) and request the data
>>'order by A,B,C' this should be portable, shouldn't it?
>>If we don't have a primary key simply ordering by 1,2,3,...n should also
>work.
>>Or am I missing something?
>
>My mistake; I thought you wanted to compare metadata. Sorting data by PK
>seems like a reasonable thing to do.
>
To make the dump diff-able, we probably need to sort the metadata by type &
name as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \| | --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/