Re: [GENERAL] intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restore default priviliges on schema public

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> I'm not seeing a very simple answer for this, unfortunately.

I'm inclined to argue that it was a mistake to include any non-pinned
objects in pg_init_privs.  The reason initdb leaves some objects unpinned
is exactly because they can be dropped and recreated, and that means
that their "initial" privileges are not static system properties.

We might need to fix pg_dump too, but I think these entries in
pg_init_privs should simply not be there.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jan de Visser
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Fwd: Query parameter types not recognized
Следующее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restoredefault priviliges on schema public