Re: Re: Leaking regexp_replace in 9.3.1 ? (was: [HACKERSUninterruptable regexp_replace in 9.3.1 ?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Re: Leaking regexp_replace in 9.3.1 ? (was: [HACKERSUninterruptable regexp_replace in 9.3.1 ?)
Дата
Msg-id 30516.1395240951@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Leaking regexp_replace in 9.3.1 ? (was: [HACKERSUninterruptable regexp_replace in 9.3.1 ?)  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения 
Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> writes:
> It looks like a simple bug pg_regexec where it's reusing a loop
> counter "n" to mean two different things. When it goes to free all the
> subdfas it looks like the code was written based "n" still being the
> number of trees but in fact it's been reused to be the number of
> matches.

Looks like it's my bug (how embarrassing).  Thanks!

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Markus Nussdorfer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #8660: RPM installation of 9.2.6 have dependency problem
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #9616: Materialized view with indexes unable to load from pg_dump