Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE
Дата
Msg-id 3272.1458835195@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE  (Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE  (Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>)
Re: NOT EXIST for PREPARE  (Yury Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com> writes:
> Tom>If you think that's not a protocol change, you are mistaken.  It
> Tom>changes a behavior that's specified in the protocol documentation.

> Even if it requires documentation, this particular change will work seamlessly
> across existing implementations of v3 protocol.

No, because it would break applications that are not expecting prepared
statement names starting with '__' to work differently than they did
before.  Not to mention that the whole idea of that being a semantically
significant property of a name is a monstrous kluge.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Christian Ullrich
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #13854: SSPI authentication failure: wrong realm name used
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Show dropped users' backends in pg_stat_activity