Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Дата
Msg-id 33570.1677442113@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> They're all animals for testing older LLVM versions. They're using
> pretty old clang versions. phycodurus and dragonet are clang 3.9, petalura and
> desmoxytes is clang 4, idiacanthus and pogona are clang 5.

[ shrug ... ]  If I thought this was actually good code, I might
agree with ignoring these warnings; but I think what it mostly is
is misleading overcomplication.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tests against running server occasionally fail, postgres_fdw & tenk1
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command