Re: Non-robustness in pmsignal.c

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Non-robustness in pmsignal.c
Дата
Msg-id 3441787.1665189358@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Non-robustness in pmsignal.c  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Non-robustness in pmsignal.c  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Why are we even tracking PM_CHILD_UNUSED / PM_CHILD_ASSIGNED in shared memory?

Because those flags are set by the child processes too, cf
MarkPostmasterChildActive and MarkPostmasterChildInactive.

> Are you thinking these should be backpatched?

I am, but I'm not inclined to push this immediately before a wrap.
If we intend to wrap 15.0 on Monday then I'll wait till after that.
OTOH, if we slip that a week, I'd be okay with pushing in the
next day or two.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Non-robustness in pmsignal.c
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Non-robustness in pmsignal.c