Re: insert/update tps slow with indices on table > 1M rows

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От andrew klassen
Тема Re: insert/update tps slow with indices on table > 1M rows
Дата
Msg-id 354284.6724.qm@web37304.mail.mud.yahoo.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на insert/update tps slow with indices on table > 1M rows  (andrew klassen <aptklassen@yahoo.com>)
Ответы Re: insert/update tps slow with indices on table > 1M rows  (PFC <lists@peufeu.com>)
Re: insert/update tps slow with indices on table > 1M rows  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: insert/update tps slow with indices on table > 1M rows  ("Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-performance

 

I am using the c-library interface and for these particular transactions

I preload PREPARE statements. Then as I get requests, I issue a BEGIN,

followed by at most 300 EXECUTES and then a COMMIT. That is the

general scenario. What value beyond 300 should I try?

 

Also, how might COPY (which involves file I/O) improve the

above scenario?

 

Thanks.

----- Original Message ----
From: James Mansion <james@mansionfamily.plus.com>
To: andrew klassen <aptklassen@yahoo.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 3:20:26 PM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] insert/update tps slow with indices on table > 1M rows

andrew klassen wrote:
> I'll try adding more threads to update the table as you suggest.
You could try materially increasing the update batch size too.  As an
exercise you could
see what the performance of COPY is by backing out the data and
reloading it from
a suitable file.


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: James Mansion
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: insert/update tps slow with indices on table > 1M rows
Следующее
От: PFC
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: insert/update tps slow with indices on table > 1M rows