Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vadim Mikheev
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2
Дата
Msg-id 36EDE401.9277B552@krs.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > select currval('"Aa"');
> 
> Someone complained they could not get a sequence named "Aa" because the
> code auto-lowercased the nextval parameter.  The new code accepts
> nextval('"Aa"'), and preserves the case.  Other cases are
> auto-lowercased.

No, just looked in new code and seems that your changes in 
parse_func.c handle currval() and setval() as well, sorry.

Vadim


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequences in 6.4.2