Re: pg_upgrade improvements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pg_upgrade improvements
Дата
Msg-id 3804.1333640050@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_upgrade improvements  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Ответы Re: pg_upgrade improvements  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Andres Freund (andres@anarazel.de) wrote:
>> Why would pipes be more useful? Its not like you could build useful pipelines 
>> with them.

> The point is to avoid the risk that someone else could connect to the
> database at the same time you're doing work on it.

Right.  Unless I misunderstand the semantics of named pipes on Windows,
we don't want that because in principle some unrelated process could
connect to it as soon as you set it up.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade improvements
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade improvements