I as always can spare services and bandwidth and can act as a
secondary as well. Please let me know if/how/when to set it up
(master server to point at really) if it's wanted.
Andrew, can't wait to see what you guys are going to release as far
as high-availability DNS is concerned.
Gavin
On Sep 21, 2006, at 2:17 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:29:36AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> If we can look forward to some further info and possible help from
>> such
>> DNS experts, I see no reason why we shouldn't wait. So, please let us
>> know when you're there.
>
> So, I spoke to my boss about this. He is an enthusiastic supporter.
>
> The project, on which I am currently working, involves a new set of
> high-availability DNS servers distributed around the world. The
> first of them is slated to turn up very late in 2006.
>
> I anticipate that we should be able to offer a secondary master node,
> if people would like, some time early in 2007. That is, it would act
> as an authoritative master, allowing zone transfers to other slaves
> if we desired.
>
> In the meantime, I'm prepared to act as another slave server. The
> location I'm thinking of putting it has 30Mb connectivity, 12 hour
> battery and on-site generators; but I could put it somewhere with
> more bandwidth if people think that'd be necessary.
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
> Information security isn't a technological problem. It's an economics
> problem.
> --Bruce Schneier
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match