Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Kyle writes:
>
> > Is there a way to get this to work without granting update to table b?
>
> Update to 7.1.]
I'm on 7.1. Should an RI trigger under 7.1 run as the DBA or as the current
user?
>
>
> > Tom, I understand someone was working on setuid functions. Is that a
> > long way off? It would be nifty if triggers could execute with the
> > privileges of the user that created them rather than the user who is
> > executing them. This would help greatly in closing some security holes
> > like this we are dealing with.