Yep.
That's exactly why we need to get it done. A document already exists.
And it's badly wrong. And we can't just "fix it".
We need a replacement. :-)
I like Thomas's suggestion of using the existing installation guide, and
making sure it has Linux specific stuff in it too.
So, I think that's what we'll do.
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> To have adequate representation of PostgreSQL in the LDP docs set.
>
> It may be sufficient to package the installation guide with some
> Linux-specific FAQ information (which afaik is now obsolete and could be
> freshened and moved to the SGML-based docs).
>
> - Thomas
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster