> > > OK, what do people want with the memcmp() fix? Tatsuo and I say apply,
> > > Tom is yes, or was,
> > Still is. I don't want to gin up a strtol fix from scratch at this
> > late date in our cycle, but I think that the memcmp fix is safe.
> OK, good. I will put the strtol on my list for 7.3. The memcmp is much
> more significant. Overflow is minor for most uses.
Right. I'll plop SunOS back into the list of supported platforms for
this release. Thanks for the work Tatsuo and Bruce!
- Thomas