Re: regular expression question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Ford
Тема Re: regular expression question
Дата
Msg-id 3D0EBB8A.8030606@blue-labs.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: regular expression question  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@atentus.com>)
Ответы Re: regular expression question  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Список pgsql-general
Yes, and honestly I rather prefer the POSIX syntax in most cases, but I
do like some of the shorthands, i.e. < (or \<) is so much easier to type
than "[[:<:]]", and the same for > v.s. "[[:>:]]".  That's just silly.
 This by the way is an extension.

-d

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

>David Ford dijo:
>
>
>
>>I wish everyone would use the same syntax...it's getting to the point
>>where you need a reference book for everybody's idea of how regex should
>>be done.
>>
>>
>
>In Linux (well, at least in Mandrake) you can look at regex(7) for the
>POSIX 1003.2 standard regexes, plus some things Henry Spencer added.  His
>implementation is the one used in Postgres internally, so it has some
>value.
>
>
>


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: regular expression question
Следующее
От: "Graeme Merrall"
Дата:
Сообщение: Accessing another db?