Re: pgAdminII 1.4.12 crash with PostgreSQL 7.3

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Didier Moens
Тема Re: pgAdminII 1.4.12 crash with PostgreSQL 7.3
Дата
Msg-id 3E0AD7A1.3010907@xs4all.be
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на pgAdminII 1.4.12 crash with PostgreSQL 7.3  (Didier Moens <moensd@xs4all.be>)
Список pgadmin-support
Hi Dave,


A merry Christmas to you (and your beloved ones), and all pgAdmin
developers.



Dave Page wrote:

>Hi Didier,
>
>Glad it's working now. It might be worth mentioning in your report, that
>the error appears to be coming from MDAC rather than pgAdmin. It appears
>the MDAC (or a component of it that pgAdmin uses) is being destroyed for
>some reason. The error message you are getting is basically the same as
>you get from an app when you are debugging a COM object in VB that the
>app is using, and you stop the debug.
>

I filed a bug report with RedHat :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80394

It would be much appreciated, if you can add your comments (as I'm not a
VB developer).


On a related note :


1. Access2K database migration with 1.4.12 is approx. 6 to 8 times
slower than previous versions (20 minutes -> over two hours), mainly in
the Foreign Key creation, it seems. I'll check if this is due to pgAdmin
(1.4.0 -> 1.4.12) or PostgreSQL (7.2.x -> 7.3).


2. Total migration execution time doesn't wrap around :
...
Creating Foreign Key: invoicesstock
Creating Foreign Key: ordersstock
Creating Foreign Key: balancessubjobs3
Creating Foreign Key: budgetssubjobs3

Migration finished at: 24/12/2002 0:20:16, taking -77438,65 seconds.


3. The 'default values' of my Access2K fields do not get migrated : is
this a bug or a missing feature ?



Kind regards,
Didier

--

Didier Moens
-----
RUG/VIB - Dept. Molecular Biomedical Research - Core IT
tel ++32(9)2645309 fax ++32(9)2645348
http://www.dmb.rug.ac.be



В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Reshat Sabiq"
Дата:
Сообщение: int types migrated one level lower
Следующее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: int types migrated one level lower