Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>Joe Conway writes:
>>>Any more thoughts on block_size (or page_size)?
>>
>>It's always been some variant spelling of "block size", and I see no
>>reason to change the terminology.
>
> Yes, that is from a coder's perspective, but from the user/admin
> perspective, it seems more like page, and in fact we probably would call
> it page if we were starting from scratch.
Hmm, I don't feel strongly either way on this, but I guess I lean toward
block_size myself. Any other opinions out there?
block_size or page_size or something else?
Joe