On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I think it would be better to utilize the existing array of child
> processes in pmsignal.c. Instead of having postmaster peek into
> WalSndCtlData, let's add a new state to PMChildFlags,
> PM_CHILD_WALSENDER, which is just like PM_CHILD_ACTIVE but tells
> postmaster that the child is not a normal backend but a walsender.
Seems good.
> I've done that in my git branch.
Could you push that git branch to a public place?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center