Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
Дата
Msg-id 407d949e1002260946i69eb58eej82415f9a6b5a7854@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> wrote:
> Let's see if I've got the concepts clear here, and hopefully my thinking it
> through will help others reading the archives.
>
> There are two queues:

I don't see two queues. I only see the one queue of operations which
have been executed on the master but not replayed yet on the slave.
Every write operation on the master enqueues an operation to it and
every operation replayed on the slave dequeues from it. Only a subset
of operations create conflicts with concurrent transactions on the
slave, namely vacuums and a few similar operations (HOT pruning and
btree index pruning).

There's no question we need to make sure users have good tools to
monitor this queue and are aware of these tools. You can query each
slave for its currently replayed log position and hopefully you can
find out how long it's been delayed (ie, if it's looking at a log
record and waiting for a conflict to clear how long ago that log
record was generated). You can also find out what the log position is
on the master.




-- 
greg


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ecpg tests broken by pgindent run