Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Sabino Mullane
Тема Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
Дата
Msg-id 408cb1135b858c3778a94a69a55fad05@biglumber.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Considering Gerrit for CFs  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> The problem with doing it in-house is that the folks who can work on it
> and maintain it will be taking time away from developing PostgreSQL.

Not sure that using Gerrit solves this. Someone will need to install it, 
maintain it, document, and hack it. Yes, hack it, as it is not a 
drop-in solution.

...
> I think one of them has, now: Gerrit.  http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/

I use Gerrit in the MediaWiki project, and it ain't pretty. The interface 
is confusing, the workflow is more complex, and the MediaWiki folks have 
had to do a lot of work to make things usable, despite their having a 
non-email-centric workflow already.

Maybe we can identify specific issues with our current app instead?

- -- 
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201302081106
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAlEVIqcACgkQvJuQZxSWSsh04gCfaK80dbuL8NnAVuViGR5sFQXN
GzwAoM+2fcI6+zFZPqkslZrWjkZ05AOo
=azLj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
Следующее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Too frequent checkpoints ?