Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Joe Conway said:
>>As a side note, I think it would be *really* helpful if there were a
>>more comprehensive test script, and an expected results file available.
>> Not sure though if it could be included in the standard regression
>>tests on a configure-conditional basis -- anyone know?
>
> To the best of my knowledge you cannot. We will provide an analogue for
> pltcl's test directory shortly, if that is desired - it will probably take a
> few days, though. I assume that will be acceptable after feature freeze?
Yup, I think that falls into Tom's "loose ends" category.
>
> At a quick glance, modulo the makefile change, the patch looks good.
Great! I'll commit shortly.
Thanks,
Joe