-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, December 12, 2007 11:40:00 -0500 Andrew Sullivan
<ajs@crankycanuck.ca> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:49:38AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>> From: pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
>> To: "pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org"
>
> This is the thing I was complaining about recently. I thought we'd agreed
> to drop on the floor all messages _to_ the list that appear to come _from_
> the list. No?
The above would never have matched anyway,as there is no list called
pgsql-patches-postgresql.org ... how does:
post
deny
/pgsql-*@postgresql.org/i
look for a patter? that would cover everything, I think ... ? I can't think
of any reason why we'd want anything to go through as a POST from any address
combination that falls in there, can you?
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHYBZb4QvfyHIvDvMRAmXpAKCww3X72GyBO35lZaZrDNULKhbu1ACeMTl7
C0jdWV3Gi4MBLDYVqHIVRCo=
=XDJu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----