Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> missing BYTE_ORDER definition for Solaris | 2007-01-10 14:18:23 | 1
> What is this BYTE_ORDER macro? Should I be using it instead of the
> AC_C_BIGENDIAN test in configure for the packed varlena patch?
Actually, if we start to rely on AC_C_BIGENDIAN, I'd prefer to see us
get rid of direct usages of BYTE_ORDER. It looks like only
contrib/pgcrypto is depending on it today, but we've got lots of
cruft in the include/port/ files supporting that.
>> row-ordering discrepancy in rowtypes test | 2007-02-10 03:00:02 | 3
> Is this because the test is fixed or unfixable?
It's fixed.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-02/msg00228.php
regards, tom lane