Gavin Sherry wrote:
>I guess my main concern is that we'll have a solution to the problem of
>dead tuples which is only half way there. It is only an incremental
>improvement upon the contrib module and solves only one real problem:
>users do not read up on VACUUM or autovacuum. This is at the expense of
>making it appear to be suitable for the general user base when it isn't,
>in my opinion. That isn't the fault of autovacuum but is a function of the
>cost of ordinary vacuum.
>
>
Would you mind expounding on why you think autovacuum isn't suitable for
the general public? I know it's not a silver bullet, but I think in
general, it will be helpful for most people.