Re: Why the planner is not using the INDEX .

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christopher Kings-Lynne
Тема Re: Why the planner is not using the INDEX .
Дата
Msg-id 42C9DEBA.4000905@familyhealth.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why the planner is not using the INDEX .  (David Gagnon <dgagnon@siunik.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
> I'm a bit surprised of that behavior thought, since it means that if we
> delete a row from table A all tables (B,C,D) with FK pointing to this
> table (A) must be scanned.
> If there is no index on those tables it means we gone do all Sequantial
> scans. Than can cause significant performance problem!!!.

Correct.

> Is there a reason why implicit index aren't created when FK are
> declared.

Because it's not a requirement...

> I looked into the documentation and I haven't found a way to
> tell postgresql to automatically create an index when creating la FK.
> Does it means I need to manage it EXPLICITLY with create index statement
> ?  Is there another way ?

No other way - you need to explicitly create them.  It's not that hard
either to write a query to search the system catalogs for unindexed FK's.

Chris


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Gagnon
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why the planner is not using the INDEX .
Следующее
От: Bruno Wolff III
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why the planner is not using the INDEX .