> On 12 Apr 2023, at 22:23, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> We don't have great coverage of macOS in the buildfarm sadly, I wonder if can
>> get sifaka to run the SSL tests if we ask nicely?
>
> I was just looking into that, but it seems like it'd be a mess.
>
> I have a modern openssl installation from MacPorts, but if
> I try to select that I am going to end up compiling with
> -I/opt/local/include -L/opt/local/lib, which exposes all of the
> metric buttload of stuff that MacPorts tends to pull in. sifaka
> is intended to test in a reasonably-default macOS environment,
> and that would be far from it.
That makes sense.
> Plausible alternatives include:
>
> 1. Hand-built private copy of openssl. longfin is set up that way,
> but I'm not really eager to duplicate that approach, especially if
> we want to test cutting-edge openssl.
>
> 2. Run a second BF animal that's intentionally pointed at the MacPorts
> environment, in hopes of testing what MacPorts users would see.
>
> #2 feels like it might not be a waste of cycles, and certainly that
> machine is underworked at the moment. Thoughts?
I think #2 would be a good addition. Most won't build OpenSSL themselves so
seeing builds from envs that are reasonable to expect in the wild is more
interesting.
--
Daniel Gustafsson