Tom Lane wrote:
>"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>
>
>>We are not trying to replace the current ODBC driver but we do things
>>a little differently which may benefit certain ODBC users. Primarily
>>we are protocol based, not libpq based ...
>>
>>
>
>Why are you repeating the mistake that the existing ODBC driver made?
>
>
I don't know that it is a mistake. It works very well in testing
for us. When we were in discussions last summer it was deemed
that was a more favorable direction. Although it will add some
maintenance issues as the protocol changes.
Joshua D. Drake
> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>