Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Markus Schaber
Тема Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal
Дата
Msg-id 44620DDE.1080500@logix-tt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal  (Nis Jorgensen <nis@superlativ.dk>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi, Nils,

Nis Jorgensen wrote:

> It will probably be quite common for the number to depend on the number
> of rows in other tables. Even if this is fairly constant within one db
> (some assumption), it is likely to be different in others using the same
> function definition. Perhaps a better solution would be to cache the
> result of the estimator function.

Sophisticated estimator functions are free to use the pg_statistics
views for their row count estimation.


HTH,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf.     | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Nis Jorgensen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PERFORM] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal
Следующее
От: Dennis Bjorklund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error