Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mark Wong
Тема Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table
Дата
Msg-id 44621AF1.9000606@osdl.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table
Список pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> Could you turn full_page_writes = off and do a few more tests? I think
> the full page writes is swamping the xlog and masking the performance we
> might see for normal small xlog writes.
> I'd try XLOG_BLCKSZ = 4096 and 8192 to start with. Thanks.

Ok, got data for XLOG_BLCKXZ at 4096, 8192, and 32768 with
full_page_wirtes = off.  The new data is at the bottom of the
page:http://developer.osdl.org/markw/pgsql/xlog_blcksz.html

Mark


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Gurjeet Singh"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error
Следующее
От: Mike Benoit
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error