Re: postgres vs. oracle for very large tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: postgres vs. oracle for very large tables
Дата
Msg-id 448F6FA1.7060106@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: postgres vs. oracle for very large tables  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:24:51PM -0700, TJ O'Donnell wrote:
>> I've written some extensions to postgres to implement
>> chemical structure searching.  I get inquiries about
>> the performance of postgres vs. oracle.  This is a huge
>> topic, with lots of opinions and lots of facts.  But,
>> today I got some feedback stating the opinion that:
>> "Postgres performance diminishes with large tables
>>  (we?ll be going to upwards of hundreds of millions of rows)."

It really depends. I have many customers with hundred of millions of
rows that don't have ANY problems.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


--

             === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
       Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
       Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
                      http://www.commandprompt.com/



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BLOB & Searching
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Short circuit evaluation of expressions in query