On 2019-09-09 14:24, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 4:58 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz
> <mailto:michael@paquier.xyz>> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 12:11:25AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > I'm not sure exactly what the upstream of mingw is these days, but I
> > think the original issue that led to 811be893 has long been fixed [0],
> > and the other stuff in mingwcompat.c is also no longer relevant
> [1]. I
> > think mingwcompat.c could be removed altogether. I'm not sure to what
> > extent we need to support 5+ year old mingw versions.
>
> On HEAD I would not be against removing that as this leads to a
> cleanup of our code. For MSVC, we only support VS 2013~ on HEAD, so
> saying that we don't support MinGW older than what was proposed 5
> years ago sounds sensible.
>
> +1, definitely.
committed
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services