Re: real multi-master replication?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: real multi-master replication?
Дата
Msg-id 45EB66D4.9030700@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: real multi-master replication?  (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>)
Список pgsql-general
> Well, it's multi-master to the degree that all servers are read/write,
> and therefore any server can take over.
>
> How would you define multi-master?
>
>
Per the original posts consideration, pgpool would have to be able to
deal with constants such as now() and current_date.
Can it?

Joshua D. Drake





В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: real multi-master replication?
Следующее
От: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Cannot digest subscribe