Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> Attached is my WIP version of the CSV logs patch. It does not include
>> docs changes.
>>
>> It fixes the CSV thinko I just posted about, and also implements the
>> "safe to rotate" scheme I suggested yesterday, at quite a modest cost.
>> As Tom rightly points out, that does not protect us against interleaving
>> log lines from different backends, which is an open problem.
>>
>
> I wonder, if we were to use an LWLock to protect writing to the stderr
> pipe, would it be too contentious?
>
>
That was the first thing I wanted to try. I'll code it up and then
people can test to see if we get a significant performance hit.
cheers
andrew