Re: WAL segment question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Chander Ganesan
Тема Re: WAL segment question
Дата
Msg-id 46B7A6A6.9010401@otg-nc.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на WAL segment question  ("Donald Fraser" <postgres@kiwi-fraser.net>)
Список pgsql-admin
Donald Fraser wrote:
Our company has two sites, a master and a disaster recovery site.
I am trying to assess whether data has been lost during a fail-over, due to the asynchronous method of transporting WAL file data between sites (we use DRBD).
 
Disaster recovery node start-up log:
user= pid=9907 timestamp=[2007-08-01 17:09:51 BST] tid= LOG:  record with zero length at 0/7C62F52C
user= pid=9907 timestamp=[2007-08-01 17:09:51 BST] tid= LOG:  redo done at 0/7C62F4E8
 
My question is: given the above WAL segment information, can I use it to decide whether information was lost in the master database site, at the point of failure, without starting the database up?
 
Regards
Donald Fraser.
DRBD is a synchronous method of transferring data - it's not asynchronous.  Assuming you are using Protocol C you should find that both are always in sync.  If you are using protocol B then things will be in sync so long as the remote system didn't crash, and if you are using Protocol A then things should be in sync as long as the local system didn't crash.
-- 
Chander Ganesan
Open Technology Group, Inc.
One Copley Parkway, Suite 210
Morrisville, NC  27560
919-463-0999/866-229-3386
http://www.otg-nc.com

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: ekzept
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: libpq.dll as part of PGDB module: access to PostgreSQL from Python
Следующее
От: Chander Ganesan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Recovery from Current WAL (8.2)