PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tony Caduto
Тема PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
Дата
Msg-id 46CD145F.90809@amsoftwaredesign.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished  (Erik Jones <erik@myemma.com>)
Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished  (Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma@yahoo.com>)
Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished  ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished  (Lewis Cunningham <lewisc@rocketmail.com>)
Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Check it out here:

http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com/pg_vs_fb


When comparing in the grid the only major advantage FB has is probably
BLOB support.
PG only suppports 1 gb while FB supports 32gb.  Bytea is pretty slow as
well when compared to the FB BLOB support.

The other area is Character sets and collation.  They support it at a
field level as well as the database.

Other than that I would say PG kicks butt.

If there is any interest I could also add MySQL 5.0 to the mix as the
third column.


Later,

Tony

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CPU load high
Следующее
От: Oleg Bartunov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How to switch off Snowball stemmer for tsearch2?