Thanks for pinpointing that out. After including your solution it shows
at least something like "UPDATE OF with id: 123456567". Unfortunately
after using coalesce, too, when building the field variable like: field
= 'field gruppe from: ' || coalesce(OLD.gruppe, '') || ' TO ' ||
coalesce(NEW.gruppe, ''); there still seem to be null values. Of course,
it can be that the user deletes a value and then there is a NULL value,
say for NEW.gruppe for example, but shouldn't the coalesce in this case
avoid that the whole field-string is empty?
Christian Rengstl M.A.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II
Kardiologie - Forschung
Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
B3 1.388
Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11
93053 Regensburg
Tel.: +49-941-944-7230
>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 10:53 AM, in message
<20071127095336.GF31593@a-kretschmer.de>, "A. Kretschmer"
<andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com> wrote:
> am Tue, dem 27.11.2007, um 10:38:09 +0100 mailte Christian Rengstl
> folgendes:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> act = 'DELETION of row with id: ' || OLD.id;
>> act = 'UPDATE OF ' || field || ' with id: ' ||
>> ...
>> INSERT INTO history(aennam, action, table_name)
VALUES(current_user,
>> act, tab);
>>
>> Now the problem is that a tuple gets added to the table history,
but
>> the field "action" (whatever the user did) is 99% empty, whereas
the
>> others are filled and I don't see why...
>>
>> Any hint is greatly appreciated
>
> Maybe sometime the concateneted fields (e.g. field, OLD.id) contains
> NULL- values. If so, the complete string 'act' will be NULL.
>
> Solution: use coalesce(field,''). Hope that helps.
>
>
> Andreas