Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Arjen van der Meijden
Тема Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks
Дата
Msg-id 479E3AE5.20600@tweakers.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks  ("Christian Nicolaisen" <blackbrrd@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks  (david@lang.hm)
Список pgsql-performance
On 28-1-2008 20:25 Christian Nicolaisen wrote:
> So, my question is: should I go for the 2.5" disk setup or 3.5" disk
> setup, and does the raid setup in either case look correct?

Afaik they are about equal in speed. With the smaller ones being a bit
faster in random access and the larger ones a bit faster for sequential
reads/writes.

My guess is that the 8x 2.5" configuration will be faster than the 6x
3.5", even if the 3.5"-drives happen to be faster they probably aren't
50% faster... So since you don't need the larger storage capacities that
3.5" offer, I'd go with the 8x 2.5"-setup.

Best regards,

Arjen

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Decibel!
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Vacuum and FSM page size
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JDBC/Stored procedure performance issue