Re: LEFT OUTER JOIN question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Frank Bax
Тема Re: LEFT OUTER JOIN question
Дата
Msg-id 481DEA45.4010603@sympatico.ca
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: LEFT OUTER JOIN question  (Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>)
Список pgsql-sql
Craig Ringer wrote:
> seiliki wrote:
>> I expect the SELECT to return two rows. Would some kind 
>> soul explain for me why it gives only one row?
> 
> Without having read the post in detail I'll make a guess: Because NULL =
> NULL results in NULL, not true, and the outer (or any other) join
> condition only accepts rows where the join condition is true.
> 
> This is a FAQ. It probably needs to go in the PostgreSQL FAQ.
> 
> The usual response is: Rethink your use of NULL values. Null really
> means "unknown" and if you're comparing for equality you probably don't
> really want NULLs to be present. If you absolutely must perform
> comparisons where NULL should be considered equal to NULL use `IS
> DISTINCT FROM` ... but as everybody here says, use of that often
> suggests design problems in your queries and schema.



Perhaps you should have read the post in detail.  There is no NULL=NULL
comparison here.

If you add column y.c2 to the SQL that produces two rows; you will see
that y.c2 is NULL; which is not meet where condition of y.c2=9 in first
SQL so therefore row is not included in results.


В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Aaron Bono"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LEFT OUTER JOIN question
Следующее
От: Ryan Wallace
Дата:
Сообщение: Working with dates before 4713 BC