Hi,
David Fetter wrote:
> While I'm a "chicken" rather than a "pig" on this project
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chicken_and_the_Pig>, I believe that
> covering the more general case right from the start would be a much
> better plan.
I was trying to say that Postgres-R internally relies only on a unique
index with not null constraint. It doesn't care if you name it PRIMARY
KEY or REPLICATION KEY or whatever.
So, it's just a question of the syntax. We already have PRIMARY KEYs,
and those are pretty much what I think is needed in 99% of all cases as
the pointer to the replication
While I'm normally an absolute fan of generality,
I think you didn't quite get the point.