Polymorphic types vs. domains

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
The proximate cause of this complaint:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2008-12/msg00283.php
seems to be that the polymorphic-type code doesn't consider a domain
over an enum type to match an ANYENUM function argument.

ISTM this is probably wrong: we need such a domain to act like its base
type for matching purposes.  There is an analogous problem with a domain
over an array type failing to match ANYARRAY; conversely, such a domain
is considered to match ANYNONARRAY which it likely should not.

Comments?  If this is agreed to be a bug, should we consider
back-patching it?  (I'd vote not, I think, because the behavioral
change could conceivably break some apps that work now.)
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: KaiGai Kohei
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268)
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268)