Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Markus Wanner
Тема Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging
Дата
Msg-id 48876C25.40409@bluegap.ch
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Hi,

Tom Lane wrote:
> You should also look at the current code for communication between
> autovac launcher and autovac workers.  That seems to be largely a
> similar problem, and it's been solved in a way that seems to be
> safe enough with respect to the postmaster vs shared memory issue.

Oh yeah, thanks for reminding me. Back when it was added I thought I 
might find some helpful insights in there. But I didn't ever take the 
time to read through it...

Regards

Markus Wanner

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Следующее
От: "Marko Kreen"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?