Re: initdb change

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: initdb change
Дата
Msg-id 48B2F240.9030302@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: initdb change  (Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: initdb change  (Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

Joshua Drake wrote:
>>
>> Is there some reason why initdb shouldn't just Do The Right Thing™
>> when it finds an empty extant $PGDATA/pg_xlog directory that passes
>> the same tests an empty extant $PGDATA would?
>>     
>
> That is what I was suggesting.
>
>   
>   

Why should the xlog directory be treated specially? We don't do this for 
any other subdirectory of PGDATA. The extra logic would be a nuisance 
and for no great gain in functionality that I can see.

This whole discussion springs from a misconception apparently, so let's 
just move on.

cheers

andrew


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing
Следующее
От: Joshua Drake
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: initdb change